Scientists from across the world have come together to predict future scenarios for the Antarctic Peninsula, and the results are startling.
The Antarctic Peninsula is warming faster than the global average and is experiencing more extreme temperature and weather events. Sea ice is in decline, glaciers are melting , and ice shelves, which act as a “safety band” to the glaciers on land, are at risk. Land ice retreat in Antarctica will result in sea level rise and destruction of ecosystems, but what exactly are the best case and worst-case scenarios for the region and the planet?
In this new paper published today (20.02.2026) in Frontiers in Environmental Science, Antarctic scientists from across the globe have come together to review available data to produce three future projections based on carbon emission scenarios.
About the research
Led by Professor Bethan Davies (Newcastle University) with co-authors including CPOM PI of Land Ice/Ice Shelf Earth Observation Professor Alison Banwell (Northumbria University) and CPOM Associate Investigator: Ice Sheet Modelling Professor Tamsin Edwards (KCL), the study brought together data from a range of sources including fresh analysis of Earth Observation data, data from the modelling intercomparison projects CMIP6 and ISMIP6 (Eyring et al., 2016; Seroussi et al., 2020), as well as published research to produce projections for three different future emission scenarios and their impact on 8 environmental aspects of the Antarctic Peninsula including marine and terrestrial ecosystems, land ice, sea ice, ice shelves, the Southern Ocean, the atmosphere, and extreme weather events.
What do the projections say?
Highest emission scenario: 4 .4 °C global temperature rise compared to preindustrial levels by 2100.
Temperature rises at this level will result in an increased number of days when the air temperature is above 0 °C which will result in significant ocean warming and more intense extreme weather events such as ocean heat waves and atmospheric rivers.
The Peninsula will see increased melt on both beneath and on the surfaces of ice shelves, with surface melting reducing the snow’s ability to absorb meltwater, allowing more meltwater ponding.
The Larsen C and Wilkins ice shelves are likely to collapse by 2100 CE under this scenario. Collapse of George VI Ice Shelf by 2300 would substantially contribute to sea level rise, as the land ice it currently holds back would accelerate into the ocean.
Under this very high emissions scenario, the Antarctic Peninsula could contribute just under 1 centimetre to global sea-level rise by 2100, rising to more than 11 centimetres by 2300.
Lower emissions scenario: 1.8 °C global temperature rise compared to preindustrial levels by 2100.
Under this scenario the team discuss how the Antarctic Peninsula’s sea ice remains similar to present and land ice is predicted to undergo only minor grounding line recession and thinning.
Changes in sea surface temperatures and the change from snow to rain will however impact marine and terrestrial ecosystems. One example will be the reduction or migration of krill, a key food source for whales and penguins.
Under a low emissions scenario, contributions from the Antarctic Peninsula remain limited, reaching just under 1 centimetre by 2100 and around 2 centimetres by 2300 – far lower than under a high emissions pathway.
Conclusion
The report is clear. Limiting global temperature rise to below 2 °C, ideally as close as possible to 1.5 °C, and governing the region effectively, will improve outcomes for the Antarctic Peninsula with only modest changes being seen there. Higher emission scenarios will result in severe changes which will be irreversible during human timescales, resulting in sea level rise and ecosystem destruction.
Professor Alison Banwell (Northumbria University), who led the ice shelves section of this paper said:
“Antarctic ice shelves act as critical buffers against sea-level rise, yet their future remains highly uncertain. They can appear stable for decades before collapsing rapidly once key structural or climatic thresholds are crossed, making these events difficult to capture in models.”
“What this study shows is that the future of the Antarctic Peninsula – including its ice shelves – depends strongly on the emissions pathway we follow. Under lower emissions, many of these systems remain stressed but largely intact; under higher emissions, we cross thresholds that lead to irreversible change.”
“The Antarctic Peninsula is already responding to climate change, but our study shows that decisions made in the coming decades will be crucial in terms of shaping its ice, ecosystems, and contribution to sea-level rise for centuries to come.”
What is CMIP6 and IMSIP6
CMIP (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project) is a framework that coordinates climate modelling efforts worldwide, bringing together modelling groups to run standardized climate simulations that can be compared and analysed collectively. ISMIP is the Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP, which is a framework bringing together international ice sheet models and coupled ice sheet-climate models to fully explore the sea level rise contribution from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. CPOM incorporates their BISICLES model into the ISMIP framework of intercomparisons, and also supported analysis of the ISMIP6 model ensembles providing robust projections of potential sea level rise for the IPCC’s 6th Assessment Report, published in 2021.
Paper information
Paper title – The Antarctic Peninsula under present day climate and future low, medium-high and very high emissions scenarios
Published in: Frontiers in Environmental Science
Lead author Bethan J. Davies (Newcastle University)
Co-authors – Angus Atkinson (Plymouth Marine Laboratory), Alison F. Banwell (University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Northumbria University, UK Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling), Mark Brandon (Open University), Thomas Caton Harrison (BAS), Peter Convey (British Antarctic Survey, University of Johannesburg/Millennium Institute, Biodiversity of Antarctic and Sub-Antarctic Ecosystems (BASE)/University of Birmingham), Jan De Rydt (Northumbria University), Klaus Dodds (WWF-UK/ Royal Holloway University of London/Middlesex University), Rod Downie (WWF-UK) Tamsin L. Edwards (KCL), Ella Gilbert (BAS), Bryn Hubbard (Aberystwyth University), Kevin A. Hughes (BAS), Gareth J. Marshall (BAS), Andrew Orr (BAS), Joeri Rogelj (Imperial College London/International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg), Hélène Seroussi (Dartmouth College), Martin Siegert (University of Exeter) Julienne Stroeve (University of Manitoba/Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI), University College London), and Jane Rumble (Polar Regions Department, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office).
Citation:
Davies BJ, Atkinson A, Banwell AF, Brandon M, Caton Harrison T, Convey P, De Rydt J, Dodds K, Downie R, Edwards TL, Gilbert E, Hubbard B, Hughes KA, Marshall GJ, Orr A, Rogelj J, Seroussi H, Siegert M, Stroeve J and Rumble J (2026) The Antarctic Peninsula under present day climate and future low, medium-high and very high emissions scenarios. Front. Environ. Sci. 13:1730203. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1730203
News Story Image Credit: Professor Alison Banwell (Northumbria University)